Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 18 de 18
Filtrar
2.
BMJ Case Rep ; 17(3)2024 Mar 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38429058

RESUMEN

A young adult male developed a left-sided pinna haematoma after a rugby injury. The haematoma reaccumulated after multiple attempts at drainage under local anaesthetic in emergency rooms and required incision and drainage in the theatre under general anaesthetic. Intraoperatively, multiple venous bleeding points were identified and these were controlled with bipolar diathermy. The wound was closed and dressed with bolster and crepe bandage. On day 7 postoperatively, the sutures and dressings were removed and the haematoma had not recurred. He returned to playing rugby on day 21 postoperatively and sustained another blunt impact to his left ear. He noticed new swelling over the posterior aspect of the same ear. This was drained via needle aspiration and there was no further reaccumulation of the pinna haematoma.


Asunto(s)
Pabellón Auricular , Rugby , Adulto Joven , Humanos , Masculino , Oído Externo/lesiones , Anestésicos Locales , Hematoma/etiología , Hematoma/cirugía
3.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 280(1): 89-96, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35598229

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The relatively new technique of trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery (TEES) when compared to microsurgery for ossiculoplasty has advantages of better visualization and no external incision but also has the disadvantage of being a one-handed procedure. Our study aimed to compare audiometric outcomes following ossiculoplasty performed via TESS with results of microsurgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from a prospective audit of 157 consecutive patients who underwent ossiculoplasty by a single otologist from 2009 to 2018 was analyzed. TEES was introduced in the department in 2014; therefore, all patients before this period underwent microsurgery. Patients were classified by surgical approach, TEES, or microsurgery. Audiological outcomes were recorded at 3 and 12 months postoperatively and compared to pre-operative levels. Other variables included were the condition of stapes and reconstruction material used. RESULTS: Of the 157 cases, 50 were TEES and 107 were microsurgery (81 microscope only and 27 combined with endoscope). There was statistically significant improvement (p < 0.001) in AC (43.4 dB pre-operatively, 36.2 dB postoperatively), BC (20.3 dB pre-operatively, 17.6 dB postoperatively), and ABG (21.8 dB pre-operatively, 16.7 dB postoperatively) in the total cohort. Both groups achieved an ABG better than 20 dB; 72% in TEES, 73% in the microscopic group, and there was no significant difference. There was no change in hearing at 12 months when compared to 3 months. No statistically significant difference was noted based on stapes condition, type of material used for ossiculoplasty, or tympanic membrane graft. CONCLUSION: TEES is safe and as effective as microsurgery in ossiculoplasty with possibly much less pain and morbidity.


Asunto(s)
Prótesis Osicular , Reemplazo Osicular , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Timpanoplastia/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos , Estribo , Reemplazo Osicular/métodos
4.
BMJ Case Rep ; 15(3)2022 Mar 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35351758

RESUMEN

A man in his twenties with a history of recurrent sinusitis was urgently referred to the emergency department (ED) by an out-of-hours general practitioner following a 2-day history of increasing right eye pain, redness and swelling after a week of coryzal symptoms. He denied visual impairment and any history of recent dental pain or procedures. Initial assessment in ED noted fever, tachycardia and hypotension. Video consultation with ophthalmologist in the ED identified proptosis, periorbital erythema and chemosis with full eye movement solely affecting the right eye. Visual acuity of 6/6 was confirmed in both eyes. After review by the ear, nose and throat (ENT) team, a diagnosis of sinogenic right orbital cellulitis was made, empirical antibiotics started and care transferred to the ENT team for immediate surgical intervention. 48 hours postoperatively, the patient acutely deteriorated, developing ophthalmoplegia and visual acuity of 6/95 in the right eye. Repeat imaging demonstrated a deteriorating picture and urgent surgery was organised at a neighbouring hospital's specialist ENT unit combined with a change to his antibiotics. On day 4, 1 day following transfer, an anaerobic bacterium, Eggerthia catenaformis, was isolated from blood cultures collected on admission. The patient improved clinically following the second surgery and targeted antimicrobial therapy, eventually being discharged 10 days after initial presentation. In addition to E. catenaformis, the Anaerobic Reference Unit (Cardiff) identified two further anaerobic bacteria, Parvimonas micra and Dialister pneumosintes This paper presents the first documented case of polymicrobial anaerobic orbital cellulitis secondary to acute bacterial sinusitis. Moreover, this case underpins the importance of broad empirical antibiotics coupled with surgical source control to effectively manage a rare but sight-threatening and life-threatening disease.


Asunto(s)
Celulitis Orbitaria , Anaerobiosis , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Composición de Base , Humanos , Masculino , Celulitis Orbitaria/diagnóstico , Celulitis Orbitaria/tratamiento farmacológico , Celulitis Orbitaria/cirugía , Filogenia , ARN Ribosómico 16S , Análisis de Secuencia de ADN , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
5.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 279(10): 4839-4845, 2022 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35192036

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Magnification with accurate optic reproduction of the surgical field is essential in otology surgery, but current technologies are subject to specific disadvantages. This study aims to evaluate a novel 3D digital stereo viewer, the Deep Reality Viewer (DRV), in otology surgery, in comparison to both a 2D monitor and the gold standard of microscopy. METHODS: In this prospective clinical research study, ENT consultants and trainees evaluated visual and practical applications of the DRV. In visual assessment, participants (n = 11) viewed pre-recorded in vivo mastoid exploration displayed on a 2D monitor and the DRV screen. In practical assessment, participants (n = 9) performed otology surgical tasks on a cadaveric human head using both the microscope and DRV. Face, task-specific (TSV) and global content (GCV) outcomes were assessed using 5-point Likert scale questionnaires. Construct validity was assessed separately. RESULTS: The DRV achieved the pre-determined validation threshold of 4 for all validation parameters in both visual and practical assessment. The DRV significantly outperformed the 2D monitor in fourteen of 16 parameters. In comparison to microscopy, there was no significant difference in 13 of 16 parameters, with the DRV significantly outperforming in the remaining 3: defining anatomy (GCV), assessing middle ear anatomy (TSV) and overall TSV. Construct validity was not demonstrated for either technology. CONCLUSION: The DRV achieved the validation threshold for all parameters, and outperformed the 2D monitor and microscopy in several parameters. This validates the DRV for performing otological procedures, and suggests that it would be a useful alternative to the gold standard of microscopy in otology surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.


Asunto(s)
Otolaringología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos , Oído Medio , Humanos , Apófisis Mastoides , Estudios Prospectivos
8.
Otol Neurotol ; 42(8): 1275-1284, 2021 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34398111

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on operative practices of otology and neurotology providers internationally. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: A 78-question survey was distributed to otologists and neurotologists between May 12, 2020 and June 8, 2020 to assess the impact of the pandemic on surgical practices. Sections within the survey delineated time periods: prior to the crisis, onset of the crisis, during the crisis, postcrisis transition. RESULTS: Of 396 survey respondents, 284 participants from 38 countries met inclusion criteria.Respondents were 16.9% female and 82.4% male, with a most common age range of 40 to 49 years (36.3%). 69.8% of participants had been in practice for over 10 years and most respondents worked in an academic medical center (79.2%). The average operative weekly caseload was 5.3 (SD 3.9) per surgeon prior to the crisis, 0.7 (SD 1.2) during the COVID-19 crisis, and 3.5 (SD 3.3) for those who had begun a postcrisis transition at the time of survey administration (p < 0.001). 71.5% of providers did not perform an elective otologic or neurotologic operative procedure during the initial crisis period. 49.8% reported modifying their surgical technique due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Use of powered air-purifying respirators and filtering facepiece 2 or 3 (FFP2/FFP3) respirators were in minimal supply for 66.9% and 62.3% of respondents, respectively. CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic impacted the otology and neurotology community globally, resulting in significant changes in operative volume and case selection. Modification of surgical technique and shortages of personal protective equipment were frequently reported.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Otorrinolaringólogos , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
10.
BMJ Case Rep ; 14(2)2021 Feb 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33526530

RESUMEN

A 15-year-old man presented with an acute history of facial swelling following a bout of forceful eructation after eating. Subcutaneous emphysema was noted on examination of his left face and neck. He was initially managed with intravenous antibiotics for suspected facial infection. A chest radiograph performed on day 3 of admission identified subcutaneous emphysema of the upper thorax and neck. CT with oral contrast confirmed extensive subcutaneous emphysema of neck, thorax and upper abdomen, with associated pneumomediastinum. The site of air leak was not identified. He subsequently underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and this was normal. Despite the delay in diagnosis, he remained haemodynamically stable, and repeated radiography showed improvement reflecting the benign course of this condition as described in existing literature. There are no previous published reports of spontaneous pneumomediastinum following eructation; therefore, high clinical suspicion should be maintained in this presentation.


Asunto(s)
Enfisema Mediastínico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfisema Subcutáneo/diagnóstico por imagen , Adolescente , Diagnóstico Tardío , Edema , Eructación/complicaciones , Cara , Humanos , Masculino , Enfisema Mediastínico/etiología , Radiografía Torácica , Enfisema Subcutáneo/etiología , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
11.
Otol Neurotol ; 42(4): 606-613, 2021 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33156238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During the Covid-19 pandemic, otolaryngologists are at risk due to aerosol-generating procedures such as mastoidectomy and need enhanced personal protective equipment (PPE). Eye protection can interfere with the use of a microscope due to a reduction in the field of vision. We aimed to study the effect of PPE on the microsurgical field. METHODS: Five surgeons measured the visual field using digital calipers at different power settings. They were done with no PPE, a surgical mask, FFP3 mask (N99), and with the addition of small goggles, large vistamax goggles, vistamax plus a face shield, and only a face shield. The measurements were repeated with rings of 5 mm increments. We also measured the "eye relief" of the microscope which is the ideal distance for maximum field of view. RESULTS: There was no major reduction of the field with the surgical or FFP3 mask. But even simple goggles reduced the field up to 31.6% and there were progressive reductions of up to 75.7% with large goggles, 76.8% when a face shield was added, and 61.9% when only face shield was used. The distance rings more than 5 mm also affected the field of view.The eye relief of our eyepiece was found to be 15 mm. CONCLUSION: The current PPE eye protection is not compatible with the use of a microscope. There is scope for research into better eye protection. Mitigation strategies including barrier drapes and alternative techniques such as endoscopic surgery or use of exoscopes should also be considered.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Microcirugia , Otorrinolaringólogos , Equipo de Protección Personal/efectos adversos , Campos Visuales , COVID-19/transmisión , Humanos , Mastoidectomía/efectos adversos , Microcirugia/instrumentación , Microcirugia/métodos , SARS-CoV-2
12.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 277(9): 2619-2623, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32415348

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The COVID-19 infection is an aggressive viral illness with high risk of transmission during otolaryngology examination and surgery. Cholesteatoma is known for its potential to cause complications and scheduling of surgery during the pandemic must be done carefully. The majority of otological surgeries may be classified as elective and postponed at this time (e.g., stapedotomy, tympanoplasty); whereas, others are emergencies (e.g., complicated acute otitis media, complicated cholesteatoma with cerebral or Bezold's abscess, meningitis, sinus thrombosis) and require immediate intervention. What is the ideal time for the surgical management of Cholesteatoma during the COVID-19 pandemic? METHODS: Senior otologic surgeons from six teaching hospitals from various countries affected by the COVID-19 from around the world met remotely to make recommendations on reorganizing schedules for the treatment of cholesteatoma which has a risk of severe morbidity and mortality. The recommendations are based on their experiences and on available literature. RESULTS: Due to the high risk of infecting the surgical staff it is prudent to stop all elective ear surgeries and plan cholesteatoma surgery after careful selection of patients, based on the extent of the disease and available resources. Specific precautions including use of appropriate personal protection equipment should be followed when operating on all patients during the pandemic. To facilitate the decision-making in the management of cholesteatoma, timing for surgery can be divided into two categories with 3 and 2 sub-groups based on disease severity. CONCLUSIONS: Evidence on the timing of surgery of patients with cholesteatoma during the COVID-19 pandemic is lacking. This manuscript contains practical tips on how cholesteatoma surgery can be reorganized during this pandemic.


Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma/cirugía , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/métodos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Profesional a Paciente/prevención & control , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otológicos/métodos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Equipo de Protección Personal , Neumonía Viral , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Colesteatoma/complicaciones , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa de Paciente a Profesional/prevención & control , Otolaringología , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , SARS-CoV-2
15.
J Int Adv Otol ; 15(3): 400-404, 2019 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31846919

RESUMEN

Canal wall down mastoidectomy is a surgical technique used for the eradication of middle ear disease. The remaining large mastoid bowl is associated with a number of issues; one of the main techniques that have been developed in order to avoid such problems is the obliteration of the mastoid cavity. The materials used for this reason are either biological or synthetic. The purpose of this survey is to review the published literature related to the therapeutic value of mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials. We searched Web of Science, PubMed, and MEDLINE from 2008 to 2018 using the criteria mastoid obliteration, canal wall down mastoidectomy, chronic otitis media, and cholesteatoma. The search focused on papers concerning the mastoid obliteration with synthetic material, as we focused on looking for outcomes and reported complications. Out of a total of 244 citations, 15 articles were identified, where patients underwent mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials. Most authors used bioactive glass as a filler material. Mastoid obliteration resulted in a decrease in the complications associated with the open mastoid cavity. On the basis of the available limited literature, it seems that mastoid obliteration with synthetic materials is a valuable and safe surgical technique for patients who undergo canal wall down mastoidectomy. The bioactive glass appears to be the most reliable synthetic material.


Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/cirugía , Apófisis Mastoides/cirugía , Mastoidectomía/instrumentación , Otitis Media/cirugía , Colgajos Quirúrgicos , Enfermedad Crónica , Conducto Auditivo Externo/cirugía , Humanos , Mastoidectomía/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
Otol Neurotol ; 40(5): 630-637, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31083088

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of validity of the Japanese Otological Society and the European Academy of Otology and Neurotology (EAONO-JOS) cholesteatoma staging system (EJS) through international collaboration to investigate: (a) feasibility of retrospectively staging previously acquired data, (b) strengths and weaknesses of the staging system. METHOD: Nine centers with prospective cholesteatoma databases were recruited. Cases were allocated to EJS Stage at each center using details from time of initial surgery. An independent rater also staged the cases and noted any discrepancies. At one center results from database staging were compared with staging based on contemporaneous operative records. Inter and intrarater reliabilities were calculated, and recidivism rates calculated according to Stage. RESULTS: Of 1482 cases of cholesteatoma, 320 (22%) were Stage 1, 977 (67%) Stage 2, 153 (11%) Stage 3 and 4 (0.3%) Stage 4. No database contained details of all parameters required for accurate staging. Staging discrepancies occurred in >10% cases but inter and intrarater reliability of staging were high (Kappa 0.8; 95% confidence interval between 0.7-0.9). At 5 years, 11% had residual and 8% had recurrent cholesteatoma: rates increased with Stage but generally not significantly (Kaplan-Meier Log Rank analysis). CONCLUSION: The EJS Staging system provides an internationally agreed standard for collecting data to classify cholesteatoma severity. Although data can be applied retrospectively with reasonable reliability, prospective data collection would prevent inaccuracies that arise from missing data fields. To enhance validity of the EJS system, we propose clearer definitions of some categories. Refinements to definitions of stage may improve prognostic utility of the EJS but should be made using evidence powered by large-scale collaboration.


Asunto(s)
Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/clasificación , Colesteatoma del Oído Medio/patología , Bases de Datos como Asunto/normas , Otolaringología/normas , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
17.
Otol Neurotol ; 38(5): 662-666, 2017 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28319495

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To investigate postoperative audiological outcomes and complication rates for fully endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery carried out by a single surgeon in one center. PATIENTS: All patients having undergone endoscopic and non-endoscopic stapes surgery for otosclerosis from September 2009 to August 2016 under a single surgeon. INTERVENTION(S): Stapedotomy using either an operating microscope or endoscope for visualization. Stapedotomy was carried out using a standard approach. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative audiometry and complications. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients who underwent endoscopic stapes surgery and 47 patients who underwent non-endoscopic stapes surgery were included in this study. Seventy-nine percent of both endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups had the average air-bone gap closed to less than 10 dBHL, respectively; the difference was not significant (p = 0.940, χ test). No patients with sensorineural hearing loss, vertigo, or facial nerve paresis were reported. Two of 34 patients (6%) of the endoscopic group had the chorda tympani cut intraoperatively for access compared with 11 of 47 patients (23%) of the non-endoscopic group. Sixteen of 47 patients (34%) required an endaural incision for access in the non-endoscopic group; no endaural incisions were made in the endoscopic group. CONCLUSION: Air-bone gap closure and patient complications did not vary significantly between endoscopic and non-endoscopic groups in this study of 34 endoscopic procedures. There is a requirement for further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods to fully gauge the safety and effectiveness of this technique.


Asunto(s)
Endoscopía/métodos , Microcirugia/métodos , Cirugía del Estribo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Endoscopía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Microcirugia/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Otosclerosis/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cirugía del Estribo/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...